MEMBER LOGIN   |   Username: Password:
Twitter: (The Twitter thing is temporarily down due to a Twitter-related bug or something!)
Recent Updates: The New Site is now open! (6 years ago) Which of [these facial express... Vulpin Adventure OST| "Blast to the past!", a review of Plazma Burst 2 by Rating Orb Duogduogduog
...

Comment #54999

Review: In A Galaxy Not Far From Here  
Nadrin`s Avatar
Rating Orb Nadrin 15 United States MelancholicPhlegmatic 9C 0F
6 years ago | (2)
I do like how you acknowledge the fact that this game has something that a lot of others don't, that the music really had a deep effect, that questions in the beginning didn't really impact your character building, the fact that there is the rare glitch, and that there weren't that many enemies you could fight. "Get used to it, you'll be seeing the hub screen a lot in this long adventure", unlike you I didn't have any problems with the hub screen. I just thought that it was an organized way to get to where you wanted to go. Isn't that all a menu is supposed to do? I didn't really mind not knowing much about the story before it sends you into battle. I knew that I would eventually be told if I played the game and accepted it. I also didn't find any problem with the text. When people were talking they filled in the plot holes that one would complain about and so I would think that they would actually read what the characters are saying. I won't go into graphics as I would argue that pixel graphics looks awesome. The enemy placement did get rather annoying, even with me having focused in weapons that shoot through walls, but even if a player does go completely into weapons that don't shoot through walls they still get the weapon that can do it and it should adequate damage if the character is a high enough level. "Bland conversation is bland", only because it is supposed to be and that adds some more believability to the characters. Altogether you didn't do as bad of a job as I may have given the impression of, I just get angry when people don't tend to care about the story in games when that is (or I should say should be) half the game and Starwish gives a lot of it.
Sameth`s Avatar
Rating Orb Sameth 18 United Kingdom Melancholic 79C 28F
6 years ago | (1)
Thanks a lot for reading the review and I greatly appreciate your feedback.
As I stated in the conclusion, I really did enjoy the game but I felt it was very flawed and tried to show it in the review. I by no means think this is a bad game (hence why I gave it a "Good" rating), and didn't intend for so many of my comments to seem so harsh. I shall bare this in mind when writing future reviews.
As for the things you picked out, I would like to defend the reasons I gave those comments.
The Hub screen: I agree with you that the hub screen is functional which is why I didn't comment on it in the body of the review,as it did exactly as a hub should do - nothing more, nothing less. The particular comment you noted was more to do with the length of the game, referring to how many aspects of the game can seem boring after the many hours of playtime this game asks of you.
The story: I feel your comments about story are valid and that it should be something developers should put more effort into, however when it's supposed to be the defining feature of a game (as in this case) and it doesn't live up to that promise then it should be berated. The way the story is always presented after a mission in the same way over and over again just became monotonous, instead of exciting had there been flashes of what was happening while you were playing a level, for example. I did read all the story segments and there's still inconsistencies, plot holes and just a general lack of polish and coherency with many parts of the overall tale. Finally, the comment about bland conversation was to do with the presentation (as I mentioned in the review) as much as the content. In terms of what the characters actually said, I rarely found it made them believable and instead all the characters' personalities rode between cliched and plain silly, often stopping off at the junction of inconsistency.
Graphics: I don't really see how mentioning pixel graphics is appropriate here, seeing as this game does not use them, and is quite entitled not to either. My problem wasn't so much the choice of graphical style, it was the lack of consistency and how the environments just looked ugly.
Enemy Placement: While there are ways to get around the annoying enemy placement it does limit the number of play styles severely. You must either get all the upgrades that let you shoot in different directions, or a weapon that lets you shoot through walls. I just felt it was a poor design choice, when the game gives you a huge wealth of options, only to limit those which are viable options.
I apologize that you may not have enjoyed my review as much as you could have, but thank you for reading it regardless. In future I will attempt to organise some of my ideas more clearly, owing to some of the issues you raised in your feedback.